ScienceBrief was built by researchers to keep up with the topical issues of climate change science and make sense of ever-expanding publications.
The ScienceBrief platform was launched in 2017 in response to the rapidly expanding scientific literature on climate change. Researchers later redeveloped it to increase usability.
Uniquely, the platform was able to show, rather than tell, the scientific consensus on topical issues of climate change science, such as the effect of climate change on wildfires, extreme rainfall, or carbon sinks.
Each of these issues was set up as a Brief (see image below), consisting of a title and short abstract, outlining the latest scientific understanding. Evidence was crowd-sourced by researchers uploading their peer-reviewed papers with a summary of the key findings, and setting the level of consensus between the paper and the Brief, ranging from refutes to supports.

The explorer tool within ScienceBrief (see image below) positioned evidence within a visualisation of consensus on the x axis and publication year on the y axis. This showed any convergence over time if more evidence appeared on the right. Evidence was tagged upon upload with keywords and geographic location, so the explorer tool was a quick way to access evidence relating to specific issues. By hovering over the publications (shown by self-organising bubbles), the reader could see the details of the paper and read the summary of the key findings.

The overall ambition for this type of technology was to support authors of major scientific assessments (e.g. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] and Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [IPBES]) to quickly identify, classify and summarise the literature, focusing their attention on the synthesis of information.
Current status of ScienceBrief
A detailed account of ScienceBrief and the vision for utilising information technology to support the aims of IPCC assessment process was given in a peer-reviewed paper in 2023, published by npj Climate Action. Within this paper, the rising potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to support a future development of a ScienceBrief-like tool is also discussed. Important investments are needed to provide AI-based tools that help authors of future assessment reports to comprehensively assess and synthesise an exponentially growing literature.
ScienceBrief Reviews
Utilising the platform to gather and synthesise evidence on some of the most popular Briefs at times of high societal interests, the team developed short briefing notes called ScienceBrief Reviews. ScienceBrief Reviews were written by small teams of international authors who worked intensely over short periods of time (typically two to three weeks) to outline the evidence and synthesise the findings. ScienceBrief Reviews were independently reviewed by an expert in the field, before being self-published. The eight ScienceBrief Reviews formed a collection published ahead of COP26 in Glasgow, in 2021.
CLICK ON THE IMAGES TO DOWNLOAD THE SCIENCEBRIEF REVIEW
Interested to know more?
Read our peer-reviewed journal paper that documents our experience with ScienceBrief and outlines our vision for information technology to assist future IPCC authors to synthesise and assess climate change information.
Funding of ScienceBrief
ScienceBrief was set up with funding from the UK Natural Environment Research Council under its International Opportunities Fund (2016-2019; grant no.NE/N013891/1). It also received funding from the European Horizon 2020 CRESCENDO (grant no. 641816), 4C (grant no. 821003) and VERIFY (grant no. 776810) projects, and the UEA’s Global Carbon Budget internal research grant.










