Pierre is an Associate Professor in EU Politics and Policy in the School of Politics Philosophy & Area studies at UEA. His research focuses on the politics and policies of energy and climate change, especially in a European context. Current research includes change in EU energy and climate governance, the comparative analysis of participation and democracy in energy transitions in Europe, the backlash against green transition policies and infrastructure, as well as the governance of offshore wind developments. Within Tyndall, he is affiliated to the theme ‘Accelerating social change’.
Pierre Bocquillon
Faculty
Selected Publications
Other
Selected Publications
Other
2025
Bocquillon, Pierre; Maltby, Tomas
The challenge of ratcheting up climate ambitions: Implementing the ‘experimentalist‘ EU energy and climate governance regulation Journal Article
In: Environmental Politics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 625–646, 2025, ISSN: 0964-4016.
@article{ba5c654314004c0b9051417088b72bb8,
title = {The challenge of ratcheting up climate ambitions: Implementing the ‘experimentalist‘ EU energy and climate governance regulation},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Tomas Maltby},
doi = {10.1080/09644016.2024.2386796},
issn = {0964-4016},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-05-01},
journal = {Environmental Politics},
volume = {34},
number = {4},
pages = {625–646},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {The 2015 Paris climate Agreement established a ‘bottom-up’, pledge and review process as international climate governance’s central framework. The European Union’s governance framework–the Energy and Climate Governance Regulation (EUGR)–uses a similar architecture. Both require states to regularly create, revise and update national plans while ramping up ambitions towards meeting the collectively agreed commitments and sharing features of Experimentalist Governance. This paper contributes to the debate on experimentalist climate governance’s effectiveness. It assesses systematically the implementation of EUGR based on documentary analysis and expert interviews. We find that the process has been partially effective in raising ambitions but has remained incremental, technocratic and depoliticised. Experimentalist processes such as the EUGR and Paris Agreement require a high level of public and stakeholder engagement to operate but politicisation can have, in turn, adverse effects. This raises questions regarding the ability of experimentalist climate governance to deliver, alone, rapid emission reductions.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The 2015 Paris climate Agreement established a ‘bottom-up’, pledge and review process as international climate governance’s central framework. The European Union’s governance framework–the Energy and Climate Governance Regulation (EUGR)–uses a similar architecture. Both require states to regularly create, revise and update national plans while ramping up ambitions towards meeting the collectively agreed commitments and sharing features of Experimentalist Governance. This paper contributes to the debate on experimentalist climate governance’s effectiveness. It assesses systematically the implementation of EUGR based on documentary analysis and expert interviews. We find that the process has been partially effective in raising ambitions but has remained incremental, technocratic and depoliticised. Experimentalist processes such as the EUGR and Paris Agreement require a high level of public and stakeholder engagement to operate but politicisation can have, in turn, adverse effects. This raises questions regarding the ability of experimentalist climate governance to deliver, alone, rapid emission reductions.
2024
Bocquillon, Pierre; Doyle, Suzanne; James, Toby S.; Mason, Ra; Park, Soul; Rosini, Matilde
The Effects of Wars: Lessons from the War in Ukraine Book
Routledge, United States, 2024.
@book{9b73ca8e5ab14c9f874dc0f0980d5ee3,
title = {The Effects of Wars: Lessons from the War in Ukraine},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Suzanne Doyle and Toby S. James and Ra Mason and Soul Park and Matilde Rosini},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-12-09},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {United States},
abstract = {War has been an ever-present feature of human existence. The analysis of wars has tended to focus on either their causes or the military and strategic consequences of a conflict. This book argues that war can have a much wider impact across layers of society that go beyond international boundaries. It presents a heuristic multi-disciplinary framework for analysing the ripple and backwash effects across five connected analytical layers around the world: material; human capabilities; economic; values belief and attitudes; policy and governance; and power. Through this framework, the book introduces a set of empirically rich and theoretically informed studies which examine the first consequences of the war in Ukraine following the invasion of Russia in February 2022. This multi-disciplinary approach shows that the effects of the war were much deeper and sustained. This volume will be of interest to students and scholars of international humanitarian law, security studies, peace and conflict studies, and European history. The chapters in this book were originally published as a special issue of Policy Studies.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
War has been an ever-present feature of human existence. The analysis of wars has tended to focus on either their causes or the military and strategic consequences of a conflict. This book argues that war can have a much wider impact across layers of society that go beyond international boundaries. It presents a heuristic multi-disciplinary framework for analysing the ripple and backwash effects across five connected analytical layers around the world: material; human capabilities; economic; values belief and attitudes; policy and governance; and power. Through this framework, the book introduces a set of empirically rich and theoretically informed studies which examine the first consequences of the war in Ukraine following the invasion of Russia in February 2022. This multi-disciplinary approach shows that the effects of the war were much deeper and sustained. This volume will be of interest to students and scholars of international humanitarian law, security studies, peace and conflict studies, and European history. The chapters in this book were originally published as a special issue of Policy Studies.
Bocquillon, Pierre; Brooks, Eleanor; Maltby, Tomas
Talkin’ bout a revolution? Institutional change in the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility: The case of climate policy Journal Article
In: JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1633–1653, 2024, ISSN: 0021-9886, (Funding Information: EB is supported by UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council grant reference MR/T023244/1). Rights Retention Statement: For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.).
@article{274dfdff87244b26b650b178afa98846,
title = {Talkin’ bout a revolution? Institutional change in the EU Recovery and Resilience Facility: The case of climate policy},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Eleanor Brooks and Tomas Maltby},
doi = {10.1111/jcms.13536},
issn = {0021-9886},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-11-01},
journal = {JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies},
volume = {62},
number = {6},
pages = {1633–1653},
publisher = {Wiley},
abstract = {The European Union (EU) post-COVID-19 investment and reform programme, the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), has been hailed as novel and ambitious, both as a fiscal instrument and as a lever for accelerating progress towards EU climate commitments. Yet, its design also exhibits strong path dependency, drawing on existing processes and commitments. Adapting theories of institutional change and models of hard/soft governance, we argue that the RRF is an example of significant yet gradual change – of evolution rather than revolution – taking place via layering and conversion of existing frameworks, and alteration of their logics of action. We show how the RRF repurposes the European Semester and track continuity and change in climate policy, a key priority area. Our findings suggest that the literature on institutional change should give greater consideration to the interplay between layering and conversion as a mechanism of gradual yet transformative evolution.},
note = {Funding Information: EB is supported by UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council grant reference MR/T023244/1). Rights Retention Statement: For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The European Union (EU) post-COVID-19 investment and reform programme, the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), has been hailed as novel and ambitious, both as a fiscal instrument and as a lever for accelerating progress towards EU climate commitments. Yet, its design also exhibits strong path dependency, drawing on existing processes and commitments. Adapting theories of institutional change and models of hard/soft governance, we argue that the RRF is an example of significant yet gradual change – of evolution rather than revolution – taking place via layering and conversion of existing frameworks, and alteration of their logics of action. We show how the RRF repurposes the European Semester and track continuity and change in climate policy, a key priority area. Our findings suggest that the literature on institutional change should give greater consideration to the interplay between layering and conversion as a mechanism of gradual yet transformative evolution.
Bocquillon, Pierre
Climate and energy transitions in times of environmental backlash? The EU ‘Green Deal’ from adoption to implementation Journal Article
In: JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 62, no. S1, pp. 124–134, 2024, ISSN: 0021-9886.
@article{cc88574f248c4af9b966f3e1deecb174,
title = {Climate and energy transitions in times of environmental backlash? The EU ‘Green Deal' from adoption to implementation},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon},
doi = {10.1111/jcms.13675},
issn = {0021-9886},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-09-01},
journal = {JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies},
volume = {62},
number = {S1},
pages = {124–134},
publisher = {Wiley},
abstract = {Riding on the 2019-2020 wave of climate mobilisations, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made climate commitments one of its core priorities with the launch of its ‘Green Deal’. To deliver on the flagship targets of reducing net Green House Gas Emissions by 55% by 2030 and achieving net zero emissions by 2050, the EU has been finalising the adoption of its ‘Fit for 55’ legislative package before a change of leadership and a new Parliament starts its work. Yet, since the launch at the ‘Green Deal’, the political momentum for climate and environmental ambitions has faltered. Russia’s war on Ukraine and concerns about the security of European energy supplies have favoured the search for alternative fossil fuel suppliers and development of new fossil fuel infrastructures. In parallel, cost of living and economic concerns have also been instrumentalised to challenge green policies, both at national and EU levels. This article asks whether these new challenges represent a risk to the implementation of the ‘Green Deal’ and to the EU’s future ambitions on climate and the energy transition. It concludes that while the energy and climate transition agenda is likely to prove resilient, its framing and focus may be changing in a context of domestic politicisation of the climate and energy transition and global geopolitical competition.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Riding on the 2019-2020 wave of climate mobilisations, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen made climate commitments one of its core priorities with the launch of its ‘Green Deal’. To deliver on the flagship targets of reducing net Green House Gas Emissions by 55% by 2030 and achieving net zero emissions by 2050, the EU has been finalising the adoption of its ‘Fit for 55’ legislative package before a change of leadership and a new Parliament starts its work. Yet, since the launch at the ‘Green Deal’, the political momentum for climate and environmental ambitions has faltered. Russia’s war on Ukraine and concerns about the security of European energy supplies have favoured the search for alternative fossil fuel suppliers and development of new fossil fuel infrastructures. In parallel, cost of living and economic concerns have also been instrumentalised to challenge green policies, both at national and EU levels. This article asks whether these new challenges represent a risk to the implementation of the ‘Green Deal’ and to the EU’s future ambitions on climate and the energy transition. It concludes that while the energy and climate transition agenda is likely to prove resilient, its framing and focus may be changing in a context of domestic politicisation of the climate and energy transition and global geopolitical competition.
Bocquillon, Pierre
Setting the European agenda in hard times: The Commission, the European Council and the EU polycrisis Journal Article
In: Journal of European Integration, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 567–574, 2024, ISSN: 0703-6337.
@article{f20b26307fbf4f0d9851001be9341328,
title = {Setting the European agenda in hard times: The Commission, the European Council and the EU polycrisis},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon},
doi = {10.1080/07036337.2024.2346707},
issn = {0703-6337},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-05-01},
journal = {Journal of European Integration},
volume = {46},
number = {4},
pages = {567–574},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {The European Commission has traditionally held a key position in setting the legislative and political agenda of the EU. However, its role has become increasingly challenged in an era of polycrisis. This is notably due to the rise of the European Council as crisis manager, which possesses the political clout, resources, and legitimacy to deal with urgent challenges. While much of the literature has debated changes in the relative powers and influence of the EU’s dual executive constituted by the European Council and Commission, a close look at their interactions in dealing with crises yields interesting insights and suggests a more complex interinstitutional choreography in agenda setting than first appears. Systematic comparative case study analysis promises to shed light on agenda setting strategies and practices across different areas and issues in the context of politicisation of EU affairs.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The European Commission has traditionally held a key position in setting the legislative and political agenda of the EU. However, its role has become increasingly challenged in an era of polycrisis. This is notably due to the rise of the European Council as crisis manager, which possesses the political clout, resources, and legitimacy to deal with urgent challenges. While much of the literature has debated changes in the relative powers and influence of the EU’s dual executive constituted by the European Council and Commission, a close look at their interactions in dealing with crises yields interesting insights and suggests a more complex interinstitutional choreography in agenda setting than first appears. Systematic comparative case study analysis promises to shed light on agenda setting strategies and practices across different areas and issues in the context of politicisation of EU affairs.
Bocquillon, Pierre; Doyle, Suzanne; James, Toby S.; Mason, Ra; Park, Soul; Rosina, Matilde
The effects of wars: Lessons from the war in Ukraine Journal Article
In: Policy Studies, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 261–281, 2024, ISSN: 0144-2872.
@article{c785216456754b999dd9264a90b87799,
title = {The effects of wars: Lessons from the war in Ukraine},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Suzanne Doyle and Toby S. James and Ra Mason and Soul Park and Matilde Rosina},
doi = {10.1080/01442872.2024.2334458},
issn = {0144-2872},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-04-22},
journal = {Policy Studies},
volume = {45},
number = {3-4},
pages = {261–281},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {War remains a central feature of global politics and has been a core focus for politics and international relations, history, economics, sociology as well as other cognate disciplines. The analysis of the effects of war has, however, tended to be compartmentalised by sub-disciplines. This article proposes a heuristic framework to map the effects of war in terms of ripple and backwash across a range of interconnected layers of societies. Through this framework, the article then introduces a set of empirically rich and theoretically informed studies from across multiple disciplines which examine the first consequences of the war in Ukraine. Taken together, these studies show that the war has had deep and complex effects affecting human life; human development; economies; values and attitudes; policy and governance; and power distribution and relations around the world. Although broader international public interest in the war may have waned within weeks of the invasion, the effects of the conflict have been deep and continued in many areas, but also differentiated across space and time. Traditional public policy concepts used to frame the effects of “external shocks” such as punctuated equilibrium and critical junctures may overlook such deep-seated and diverse effects, warranting the multidisciplinary lenses used in this volume.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
War remains a central feature of global politics and has been a core focus for politics and international relations, history, economics, sociology as well as other cognate disciplines. The analysis of the effects of war has, however, tended to be compartmentalised by sub-disciplines. This article proposes a heuristic framework to map the effects of war in terms of ripple and backwash across a range of interconnected layers of societies. Through this framework, the article then introduces a set of empirically rich and theoretically informed studies from across multiple disciplines which examine the first consequences of the war in Ukraine. Taken together, these studies show that the war has had deep and complex effects affecting human life; human development; economies; values and attitudes; policy and governance; and power distribution and relations around the world. Although broader international public interest in the war may have waned within weeks of the invasion, the effects of the conflict have been deep and continued in many areas, but also differentiated across space and time. Traditional public policy concepts used to frame the effects of “external shocks” such as punctuated equilibrium and critical junctures may overlook such deep-seated and diverse effects, warranting the multidisciplinary lenses used in this volume.
2022
Bocquillon, Pierre; Evrard, Aurélien
Energy Governance in France: A nuclearized socio-technical regime ‘in transition’? Book Chapter
In: Knodt, Michèle; Kemmerzell, Jörg (Ed.): Handbook of Energy Governance in Europe, pp. 1–21, Springer, Germany, 2022, ISBN: 978-3-319-73526-9.
@inbook{fcce77113c2840bb89beb551209b2647,
title = {Energy Governance in France: A nuclearized socio-technical regime ‘in transition’?},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Aurélien Evrard},
editor = {Michèle Knodt and Jörg Kemmerzell},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-73526-9_10-1},
isbn = {978-3-319-73526-9},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-07},
booktitle = {Handbook of Energy Governance in Europe},
pages = {1–21},
publisher = {Springer},
address = {Germany},
abstract = {French energy governance is the embodiment of a stable and closed policy subsystem. It is characterized by large-scale centralized infrastructures, the singular dominance of nuclear energy, and historically controlled by a technocratic network of bureaucratic and economic elites. Yet, under the umbrella of the “energy transition,” the country has adopted a series of new targets, strategies, and legislation to increase the share of renewables, energy savings, and reduce GHG emissions. In addition, it has engaged in the twin endeavours of “democratizing” the decision-making process and “decentralizing” energy and climate action. Yet, despite ambitious rhetoric and noticeable new initiatives, French energy governance remains at a crossroad. While emerging dynamics, from the consolidation of a coalition of green actors, to the politicization of energy debates, and to the activism of local authorities, points to incremental change, powerful veto players and sources of path dependence remain.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
French energy governance is the embodiment of a stable and closed policy subsystem. It is characterized by large-scale centralized infrastructures, the singular dominance of nuclear energy, and historically controlled by a technocratic network of bureaucratic and economic elites. Yet, under the umbrella of the “energy transition,” the country has adopted a series of new targets, strategies, and legislation to increase the share of renewables, energy savings, and reduce GHG emissions. In addition, it has engaged in the twin endeavours of “democratizing” the decision-making process and “decentralizing” energy and climate action. Yet, despite ambitious rhetoric and noticeable new initiatives, French energy governance remains at a crossroad. While emerging dynamics, from the consolidation of a coalition of green actors, to the politicization of energy debates, and to the activism of local authorities, points to incremental change, powerful veto players and sources of path dependence remain.
2020
Bocquillon, Pierre; Brooks, Eleanor; Maltby, Tomas
Speak softly and carry a big stick: Hardening soft governance in EU energy and health policies Journal Article
In: Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 843–856, 2020, ISSN: 1523-908X.
@article{9faf6f6f9988476cbb28d9563c73a576,
title = {Speak softly and carry a big stick: Hardening soft governance in EU energy and health policies},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Eleanor Brooks and Tomas Maltby},
doi = {10.1080/1523908X.2020.1792860},
issn = {1523-908X},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-07-10},
journal = {Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning},
volume = {22},
number = {6},
pages = {843–856},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {EU governance is experiencing a shift towards soft governance frameworks that incorporate ‘harder’ elements. Using a qualitative case study approach and an original set of elite interviews, we examine two policy areas – health and energy – where similar such architectures – the European Semester and the Energy Union Governance Regulation – are now core governance tools. Three research questions are addressed: (1) What mechanisms are employed to harden these governance frameworks? (2) What is driving this shift? And, drawing on the more extensive experience of the Semester, (3) What lessons can be drawn for energy policy? We establish the experimentalist nature of these two governance architectures and identify a mix of ‘harder soft governance’ (HSG) mechanisms used in both cases. We show that, although similar in structure, the shift towards HSG frameworks is driven by different factors in each case. The more extensive experience of the Semester in health points to the importance of concrete implementation practices; the power of specificity to strengthen soft commitments; the role of policy coupling as a lever for implementation; the potential influence of strategic entrepreneurs; the role of politicisation in pressuring change; and the significance of periodic revision as windows of opportunity for incremental change.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
EU governance is experiencing a shift towards soft governance frameworks that incorporate ‘harder’ elements. Using a qualitative case study approach and an original set of elite interviews, we examine two policy areas – health and energy – where similar such architectures – the European Semester and the Energy Union Governance Regulation – are now core governance tools. Three research questions are addressed: (1) What mechanisms are employed to harden these governance frameworks? (2) What is driving this shift? And, drawing on the more extensive experience of the Semester, (3) What lessons can be drawn for energy policy? We establish the experimentalist nature of these two governance architectures and identify a mix of ‘harder soft governance’ (HSG) mechanisms used in both cases. We show that, although similar in structure, the shift towards HSG frameworks is driven by different factors in each case. The more extensive experience of the Semester in health points to the importance of concrete implementation practices; the power of specificity to strengthen soft commitments; the role of policy coupling as a lever for implementation; the potential influence of strategic entrepreneurs; the role of politicisation in pressuring change; and the significance of periodic revision as windows of opportunity for incremental change.
Bocquillon, Pierre; Maltby, Tomas
EU energy policy integration as embedded intergovernmentalism: The case of Energy Union governance Journal Article
In: Journal of European Integration, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 39–57, 2020, ISSN: 0703-6337.
@article{c319b0abc0fe46c0bd82645ad1752218,
title = {EU energy policy integration as embedded intergovernmentalism: The case of Energy Union governance},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Tomas Maltby},
doi = {10.1080/07036337.2019.1708339},
issn = {0703-6337},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-11},
journal = {Journal of European Integration},
volume = {42},
number = {1},
pages = {39–57},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {The launch of the ‘Energy Union’ in 2014, represented a major step to deepen EU cooperation in energy and climate policies. Yet, in energy, member states have remained particularly jealous of their sovereignty, limiting the pace and scope of integration. EU energy policy appears to fit the specifications of ‘new intergovernmentalism’ (NI). Member states have been keen on reinforcing cooperation but have refrained from delegating further authority to supranational institutions, preferring to maintain a high level of control within the Council and European Council. However, focusing on the Energy Union Governance Regulation adopted in 2018, we argue that the sector does not fit neatly within this NI account. Although governments remain central to the process, they operate within a hybrid institutional framework combining supranational and intergovernmental elements, in which formal and informal authority distribution is unstable and contested. We suggest this form of governance is better described as ‘embedded intergovernmentalism’.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The launch of the ‘Energy Union’ in 2014, represented a major step to deepen EU cooperation in energy and climate policies. Yet, in energy, member states have remained particularly jealous of their sovereignty, limiting the pace and scope of integration. EU energy policy appears to fit the specifications of ‘new intergovernmentalism’ (NI). Member states have been keen on reinforcing cooperation but have refrained from delegating further authority to supranational institutions, preferring to maintain a high level of control within the Council and European Council. However, focusing on the Energy Union Governance Regulation adopted in 2018, we argue that the sector does not fit neatly within this NI account. Although governments remain central to the process, they operate within a hybrid institutional framework combining supranational and intergovernmental elements, in which formal and informal authority distribution is unstable and contested. We suggest this form of governance is better described as ‘embedded intergovernmentalism’.
2019
Mercure, Jean-François; Paim, Maria-Augusta; Bocquillon, Pierre; Lindner, Soeren; Salas, Pablo; Martinelli, Paula; Berchin, Issa; Guerra, José Baltazar Andrade; Derani, Cristiane; Junior, Celso Albuquerque; Ribeiro, Joao; Knobloch, Florian; Pollitt, Hector; Edwards, Neil; Holden, Philip; Foley, Aideen; Schaphoff, S.; Faraco, Rafael; Vinuales, Jorge
System complexity and policy integration challenges: The Brazilian Energy-Water-Food Nexus Journal Article
In: Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 105, pp. 230–243, 2019, ISSN: 1364-0321.
@article{8cf904e268b94a8abab255c051ad7ffa,
title = {System complexity and policy integration challenges: The Brazilian Energy-Water-Food Nexus},
author = {Jean-François Mercure and Maria-Augusta Paim and Pierre Bocquillon and Soeren Lindner and Pablo Salas and Paula Martinelli and Issa Berchin and José Baltazar Andrade Guerra and Cristiane Derani and Celso Albuquerque Junior and Joao Ribeiro and Florian Knobloch and Hector Pollitt and Neil Edwards and Philip Holden and Aideen Foley and S. Schaphoff and Rafael Faraco and Jorge Vinuales},
doi = {10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.045},
issn = {1364-0321},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-05-01},
journal = {Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews},
volume = {105},
pages = {230–243},
publisher = {Elsevier},
abstract = {The Energy-Water-Food Nexus is one of the most complex sustainability challenges faced by the world. This is particularly true in Brazil, where insufficiently understood interactions within the Nexus are contributing to large-scale deforestation and land-use change, water and energy scarcity, and increased vulnerability to climate change. The reason is a combination of global environmental change and global economic change, putting unprecedented pressures on the Brazilian environment and ecosystems. In this paper, we identify and discuss the main Nexus challenges faced by Brazil across sectors (e.g. energy, agriculture, water) and scales (e.g. federal, state, municipal). We use four case studies to explore all nodes of the Nexus. For each, we analyse data from economic and biophysical modelling sources in combination with an overview of the legislative and policy landscape, in order to identify governance shortcomings in the context of growing challenges. We analyse the complex interdependence of developments at the global and local (Brazilian) levels, highlighting the impact of global environmental and economic change on Brazil and, conversely, that of developments in Brazil for other countries and the world. We conclude that there is a need to adjust the scientific approach to these challenges as an enabling condition for stronger science-policy bridges for sustainability policy-making.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The Energy-Water-Food Nexus is one of the most complex sustainability challenges faced by the world. This is particularly true in Brazil, where insufficiently understood interactions within the Nexus are contributing to large-scale deforestation and land-use change, water and energy scarcity, and increased vulnerability to climate change. The reason is a combination of global environmental change and global economic change, putting unprecedented pressures on the Brazilian environment and ecosystems. In this paper, we identify and discuss the main Nexus challenges faced by Brazil across sectors (e.g. energy, agriculture, water) and scales (e.g. federal, state, municipal). We use four case studies to explore all nodes of the Nexus. For each, we analyse data from economic and biophysical modelling sources in combination with an overview of the legislative and policy landscape, in order to identify governance shortcomings in the context of growing challenges. We analyse the complex interdependence of developments at the global and local (Brazilian) levels, highlighting the impact of global environmental and economic change on Brazil and, conversely, that of developments in Brazil for other countries and the world. We conclude that there is a need to adjust the scientific approach to these challenges as an enabling condition for stronger science-policy bridges for sustainability policy-making.
Kehoe, Laura; Reis, Tiago; Virah-Sawmy, Malika; Balmford, Andrew; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Knohl, Alexander; Antonelli, Alexandre; Hochkirch, Axel; Vira, Bhaskar; Massa, Bruno; Peres, Carlos A.; Ammer, Christian; Görg, Christoph; Schneider, Christoph; Curtis, David; Peña, Eduardo; Tello, Enric; Sperfeld, Erik; Corbera, Esteve; Morelli, Federico; Valladares, Fernando; Peterson, Garry; Hide, Geoff; Mace, Georgina; Kallis, Giorgos; Olsson, Gunilla Almered; Brumelis, Guntis; Alexanderson, Helena; Haberl, Helmut; Nuissl, Henning; Kreft, Holger; Ghazoul, Jaboury; Piotrowski, Jan A.; Macdiarmid, Jennie; Newig, Jens; Fischer, Joern; Nielsen, Jonas; Barlow, Jos; Jones, Julia Patricia Gordon; Whittaker, Robert J.; Krueger, Tobias; Sutherland, William J.; Crona, Beatrice; Franco, Aldina; Schroeder, Heike; Sullivan, Martin; Bocquillon, Pierre; Carmenta, Rachel; Richardson, Vanessa A.; Johnson, Mark D.; signatories, 604
Make EU trade with Brazil sustainable Journal Article
In: Science, vol. 364, no. 6438, pp. 341, 2019, ISSN: 0036-8075.
@article{26c6e324a0ca4a7ab22f8c7526ff170c,
title = {Make EU trade with Brazil sustainable},
author = {Laura Kehoe and Tiago Reis and Malika Virah-Sawmy and Andrew Balmford and Tobias Kuemmerle and Alexander Knohl and Alexandre Antonelli and Axel Hochkirch and Bhaskar Vira and Bruno Massa and Carlos A. Peres and Christian Ammer and Christoph Görg and Christoph Schneider and David Curtis and Eduardo Peña and Enric Tello and Erik Sperfeld and Esteve Corbera and Federico Morelli and Fernando Valladares and Garry Peterson and Geoff Hide and Georgina Mace and Giorgos Kallis and Gunilla Almered Olsson and Guntis Brumelis and Helena Alexanderson and Helmut Haberl and Henning Nuissl and Holger Kreft and Jaboury Ghazoul and Jan A. Piotrowski and Jennie Macdiarmid and Jens Newig and Joern Fischer and Jonas Nielsen and Jos Barlow and Julia Patricia Gordon Jones and Robert J. Whittaker and Tobias Krueger and William J. Sutherland and Beatrice Crona and Aldina Franco and Heike Schroeder and Martin Sullivan and Pierre Bocquillon and Rachel Carmenta and Vanessa A. Richardson and Mark D. Johnson and 604 signatories},
doi = {10.1126/science.aaw8276},
issn = {0036-8075},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-04-26},
journal = {Science},
volume = {364},
number = {6438},
pages = {341},
publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2018
Jucker, Tomasso; Wintle, Bonnie; Shackelford, Gorm; Bocquillon, Pierre; Geffert, Jan Laurens; Kasaor, Tim; Kovacs, Eszter; Mumby, Hannah S.; Orland, Chloé; Schleicher, Judith; Tew, Eleanor R.; Zabala, Aiora; Amano, Tatsuya; Bell, Alexandra; Bongalov, Boris; Chambers, Josephine M.; Corrigan, Colleen; Durán, América P.; Duvic-Paoli, Leslie-Anne; Emilson, Caroline; da Silva, Jéssica Fonseca; Garnett, Emma E.; Green, Elizabeth J.; Guth, Miriam K.; Hacket-Pain, Andrew; Hinsley, Amy; Igea, Javier; Kunz, Martina; Luke, Sarah H.; Lynam, William; Martin, Philip A.; Nunes, Matheus H.; Ockendon, Nancy; Pavitt, Aly; Payne, Charlotte L. R.; Plutshack, Victoria; Rademacher, Tim T.; Robertson, Rebecca J.; Rose, David C.; Serban, Anca; Simmons, Benno I.; Emilson, Erik J. S.; Tayleur, Catherine; Wordley, Claire F. R.; Mukherjee, Nibedita
Ten-year assessment of the 100 priority questions for global biodiversity conservation Journal Article
In: Conservation Biology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1457–1463, 2018, ISSN: 0888-8892.
@article{c2f4ba1287794dbd9951f742909d5854,
title = {Ten-year assessment of the 100 priority questions for global biodiversity conservation},
author = {Tomasso Jucker and Bonnie Wintle and Gorm Shackelford and Pierre Bocquillon and Jan Laurens Geffert and Tim Kasaor and Eszter Kovacs and Hannah S. Mumby and Chloé Orland and Judith Schleicher and Eleanor R. Tew and Aiora Zabala and Tatsuya Amano and Alexandra Bell and Boris Bongalov and Josephine M. Chambers and Colleen Corrigan and América P. Durán and Leslie-Anne Duvic-Paoli and Caroline Emilson and Jéssica Fonseca da Silva and Emma E. Garnett and Elizabeth J. Green and Miriam K. Guth and Andrew Hacket-Pain and Amy Hinsley and Javier Igea and Martina Kunz and Sarah H. Luke and William Lynam and Philip A. Martin and Matheus H. Nunes and Nancy Ockendon and Aly Pavitt and Charlotte L. R. Payne and Victoria Plutshack and Tim T. Rademacher and Rebecca J. Robertson and David C. Rose and Anca Serban and Benno I. Simmons and Erik J. S. Emilson and Catherine Tayleur and Claire F. R. Wordley and Nibedita Mukherjee},
doi = {10.1111/cobi.13159},
issn = {0888-8892},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-12-01},
journal = {Conservation Biology},
volume = {32},
number = {6},
pages = {1457–1463},
publisher = {Wiley},
abstract = {In 2008, a group of conservation scientists compiled a list of 100 priority questions for the conservation of the world's biodiversity [Sutherland et al. (2009) Conservation Biology, 23, 557–567]. However, now almost a decade later, no one has yet published a study gauging how much progress has been made in addressing these 100 high‐priority questions in the peer‐reviewed literature. Here we take a first step toward re‐examining the 100 questions and identify key knowledge gaps that still remain. Through a combination of a questionnaire and a literature review, we evaluated each of the 100 questions on the basis of two criteria: relevance and effort. We defined highly‐relevant questions as those which – if answered – would have the greatest impact on global biodiversity conservation, while effort was quantified based on the number of review publications addressing a particular question, which we used as a proxy for research effort. Using this approach we identified a set of questions that, despite being perceived as highly relevant, have been the focus of relatively few review publications over the past ten years. These questions covered a broad range of topics but predominantly tackled three major themes: the conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems, the role of societal structures in shaping interactions between people and the environment, and the impacts of conservation interventions. We see these questions as important knowledge gaps that have so far received insufficient attention and may need to be prioritised in future research.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
In 2008, a group of conservation scientists compiled a list of 100 priority questions for the conservation of the world’s biodiversity [Sutherland et al. (2009) Conservation Biology, 23, 557–567]. However, now almost a decade later, no one has yet published a study gauging how much progress has been made in addressing these 100 high‐priority questions in the peer‐reviewed literature. Here we take a first step toward re‐examining the 100 questions and identify key knowledge gaps that still remain. Through a combination of a questionnaire and a literature review, we evaluated each of the 100 questions on the basis of two criteria: relevance and effort. We defined highly‐relevant questions as those which – if answered – would have the greatest impact on global biodiversity conservation, while effort was quantified based on the number of review publications addressing a particular question, which we used as a proxy for research effort. Using this approach we identified a set of questions that, despite being perceived as highly relevant, have been the focus of relatively few review publications over the past ten years. These questions covered a broad range of topics but predominantly tackled three major themes: the conservation and management of freshwater ecosystems, the role of societal structures in shaping interactions between people and the environment, and the impacts of conservation interventions. We see these questions as important knowledge gaps that have so far received insufficient attention and may need to be prioritised in future research.
Bocquillon, Pierre
(De‐)Constructing coherence? Strategic entrepreneurs, policy frames and the integration of climate and energy policies in the European Union Journal Article
In: Environmental Policy and Governance, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 339–349, 2018, ISSN: 1756-932X.
@article{77c1e8ca8e0b4f7a9cf7c53eaa7442c6,
title = {(De‐)Constructing coherence? Strategic entrepreneurs, policy frames and the integration of climate and energy policies in the European Union},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon},
doi = {10.1002/eet.1820},
issn = {1756-932X},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
journal = {Environmental Policy and Governance},
volume = {28},
number = {5},
pages = {339–349},
publisher = {Wiley},
abstract = {This paper looks at the way policy entrepreneurs construct horizontal coherence through problem definition and the promotion of policy frames that bond different objectives and instruments together. Building on the case of the 2009 climate and energy package, the paper analyses how the European Commission and successive European Union Presidencies exploited a growing climate change momentum to devise, assemble and facilitate the adoption in an exceptionally short period of an ambitious legislative package cutting across traditional sectoral boundaries. The recourse to a narrative presenting Europe at the vanguard of a green revolution and the framing of European internal policies as a tool for international climate leadership were instrumental in constructing the package as a coherent response to the joint energy and climate change challenges, and in rallying wide support. However, the paper shows that the institutionalization of this framing has been undermined by the economic crisis and stalled international negotiations.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This paper looks at the way policy entrepreneurs construct horizontal coherence through problem definition and the promotion of policy frames that bond different objectives and instruments together. Building on the case of the 2009 climate and energy package, the paper analyses how the European Commission and successive European Union Presidencies exploited a growing climate change momentum to devise, assemble and facilitate the adoption in an exceptionally short period of an ambitious legislative package cutting across traditional sectoral boundaries. The recourse to a narrative presenting Europe at the vanguard of a green revolution and the framing of European internal policies as a tool for international climate leadership were instrumental in constructing the package as a coherent response to the joint energy and climate change challenges, and in rallying wide support. However, the paper shows that the institutionalization of this framing has been undermined by the economic crisis and stalled international negotiations.
Bocquillon, Pierre
The Politics of Nuclear Energy in Western Europe, edited by W.C.Müller and P.W.Thurner (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, ISBN 9780198747031); xv+376 pp., £65.00 hb. Journal Article
In: JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1488–1489, 2018, ISSN: 0021-9886.
@article{74fcc59fd40f4fd7855e3cd498135865,
title = {The Politics of Nuclear Energy in Western Europe, edited by W.C.Müller and P.W.Thurner (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, ISBN 9780198747031); xv+376 pp., £65.00 hb.},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon},
issn = {0021-9886},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
journal = {JCMS-Journal of Common Market Studies},
volume = {56},
number = {6},
pages = {1488–1489},
publisher = {Wiley},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Lenschow, Andrea; Bocquillon, Pierre; Carafa, Luigi
Understanding coherence between policy spheres Journal Article
In: Environmental Policy and Governance, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 323–328, 2018, ISSN: 1756-932X.
@article{1c6ddb45b808478d82efc190081e3e70,
title = {Understanding coherence between policy spheres},
author = {Andrea Lenschow and Pierre Bocquillon and Luigi Carafa},
doi = {10.1002/eet.1818},
issn = {1756-932X},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
journal = {Environmental Policy and Governance},
volume = {28},
number = {5},
pages = {323–328},
publisher = {Wiley},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Berchin, Issa Ibrahim; Silva, Sthefanie Aguiar Da; Bocquillon, Pierre; Fornasari, Vitória Haendchen; Ribeiro, Larissa Pereira Cipoli; Ribeiro, João Marcelo Pereira; Guerra, José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório De Andrade
Contributions of Public Policies to Greening Sugarcane Ethanol Production in Brazil Book Chapter
In: Filho, Walter Leal; Pociovălișteanu, Diana Mihaela; de Brito, Paulo Roberto Borges; de Lima, Ismar Borges (Ed.): Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives, pp. 375–393, Springer, Germany, 2018, ISBN: 978-3-319-73027-1.
@inbook{2f25ee550145464db046198685788969,
title = {Contributions of Public Policies to Greening Sugarcane Ethanol Production in Brazil},
author = {Issa Ibrahim Berchin and Sthefanie Aguiar Da Silva and Pierre Bocquillon and Vitória Haendchen Fornasari and Larissa Pereira Cipoli Ribeiro and João Marcelo Pereira Ribeiro and José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório De Andrade Guerra},
editor = {Walter Leal Filho and Diana Mihaela Pociovălișteanu and Paulo Roberto Borges de Brito and Ismar Borges de Lima},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_20},
isbn = {978-3-319-73027-1},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-21},
booktitle = {Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives},
pages = {375–393},
publisher = {Springer},
address = {Germany},
series = {World Sustainability Series},
abstract = {The development of a green economy is key to achieve sustainable development. Investing in greening the energy sector contributes to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions while helping to develop a more resilient economy. Public policies have a role in driving the biofuel sector towards a more sustainable path, reducing its environmental footprint and enhancing its economic, environmental and social benefits. The aim of this study is to analyse how public policies can contribute to greening the ethanol sector in Brazil. To accomplish this objective, a review of the economic characteristics of the Brazilian ethanol sector was conducted, based on official documents and reports, policies and on scientific studies. Then, a review of Brazilian public policies was conduced to analyse how public polices influence the sustainable production of the Brazilian ethanol sector. Brazilian bioenergy policies have contributed to establish a green biofuel sector, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, enhancing the efficiency in sugarcane production, creating jobs and improving air quality in cities.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
The development of a green economy is key to achieve sustainable development. Investing in greening the energy sector contributes to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions while helping to develop a more resilient economy. Public policies have a role in driving the biofuel sector towards a more sustainable path, reducing its environmental footprint and enhancing its economic, environmental and social benefits. The aim of this study is to analyse how public policies can contribute to greening the ethanol sector in Brazil. To accomplish this objective, a review of the economic characteristics of the Brazilian ethanol sector was conducted, based on official documents and reports, policies and on scientific studies. Then, a review of Brazilian public policies was conduced to analyse how public polices influence the sustainable production of the Brazilian ethanol sector. Brazilian bioenergy policies have contributed to establish a green biofuel sector, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, enhancing the efficiency in sugarcane production, creating jobs and improving air quality in cities.
2017
Bocquillon, Pierre; Evrard, Aurélien
Complying with, resisting or using Europe?: Explaining the uneven and diffuse Europeanization of French renewable electricity and biofuels policies Book Chapter
In: Solorio, Israel; Jörgens, Helge (Ed.): A Guide to EU Renewable Energy Policy, Edward Elgar, 2017, ISBN: 978 1 78347 155 3.
@inbook{6c3dc37221184c39989c32e8a6857953,
title = {Complying with, resisting or using Europe?: Explaining the uneven and diffuse Europeanization of French renewable electricity and biofuels policies},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Aurélien Evrard},
editor = {Israel Solorio and Helge Jörgens},
isbn = {978 1 78347 155 3},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-06-01},
booktitle = {A Guide to EU Renewable Energy Policy},
publisher = {Edward Elgar},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Solorio, Israel; Bocquillon, Pierre
EU renewable energy policy: A brief overview of its history and evolution Book Chapter
In: Solorio, Israel; Jörgens, Helge (Ed.): A Guide to EU Renewable Energy Policy, Edward Elgar, 2017, ISBN: 978 1 78347 155 3.
@inbook{384ec423581f4a6798e2c98a6427537c,
title = {EU renewable energy policy: A brief overview of its history and evolution},
author = {Israel Solorio and Pierre Bocquillon},
editor = {Israel Solorio and Helge Jörgens},
isbn = {978 1 78347 155 3},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-06-01},
booktitle = {A Guide to EU Renewable Energy Policy},
publisher = {Edward Elgar},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Bocquillon, Pierre; Maltby, Tomas
The more the merrier? Assessing the impact of enlargement on European energy and climate change policies Journal Article
In: East European Politics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 88–105, 2017, ISSN: 2159-9165.
@article{1d205320baa544f6b772de91d90695dc,
title = {The more the merrier? Assessing the impact of enlargement on European energy and climate change policies},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Tomas Maltby},
doi = {10.1080/21599165.2017.1279605},
issn = {2159-9165},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {East European Politics},
volume = {33},
number = {1},
pages = {88–105},
publisher = {Taylor and Francis},
abstract = {This article examines the impact of enlargement on European Union performance in energy and climate change policies. It looks at process-driven performance, focusing on agenda-setting, negotiation dynamics and institutional change – as well as outcome-driven performance, looking at the ambitiousness of policy objectives and their implementation. The empirical analysis is based on qualitative, comparative case studies of EU climate change and energy security policies. The article shows that enlargement has had a nuanced but contrasted impact on the two areas. It also points to the recent assertiveness of Central and Eastern European Countries in both energy security and climate policy.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This article examines the impact of enlargement on European Union performance in energy and climate change policies. It looks at process-driven performance, focusing on agenda-setting, negotiation dynamics and institutional change – as well as outcome-driven performance, looking at the ambitiousness of policy objectives and their implementation. The empirical analysis is based on qualitative, comparative case studies of EU climate change and energy security policies. The article shows that enlargement has had a nuanced but contrasted impact on the two areas. It also points to the recent assertiveness of Central and Eastern European Countries in both energy security and climate policy.
2016
Bocquillon, Pierre; Evrard, Aurélien
French Climate Policy: Diplomacy in the Service of Symbolic Leadership Book Chapter
In: Wurzel, Rüdiger; Connelly, James; Liefferink, Duncan (Ed.): The European Union in International Climate Change Politics, pp. 98–113, Routledge, United States, 2016, ISBN: 9781138647183.
@inbook{78fb6f1a77594488a1c5cdddccaefea2,
title = {French Climate Policy: Diplomacy in the Service of Symbolic Leadership},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Aurélien Evrard},
editor = {Rüdiger Wurzel and James Connelly and Duncan Liefferink},
isbn = {9781138647183},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-11-18},
booktitle = {The European Union in International Climate Change Politics},
pages = {98–113},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {United States},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Bocquillon, Pierre; Evrard, Aurélien
Rattraper ou devancer l’Europe? Politiques françaises des énergies renouvelables et dynamiques d’européanisation Journal Article
In: Politique Européenne, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 32–56, 2016, ISSN: 1623-6297.
@article{644c916e52c94fecb1de7c4a27a4dd14,
title = {Rattraper ou devancer l’Europe? Politiques françaises des énergies renouvelables et dynamiques d’européanisation},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Aurélien Evrard},
issn = {1623-6297},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-11-14},
journal = {Politique Européenne},
volume = {52},
number = {2},
pages = {32–56},
publisher = {Pepper-L'Harmattan},
abstract = {La France a échoué de façon répétée à atteindre ses objectifs européens en matière de consommation d’électricité d’origine renouvelable. Quant au rapide développement des agrocarburants, il tient d’abord au poids et à l’influence du secteur agricole domestique. Cela ne signifie pas pour autant que la construction européenne a été sans influence sur les politiques françaises de soutien aux énergies renouvelables, mais pas nécessairement sur un mode hiérarchique. Afin de rendre compte des interactions entre politiques françaises et européennes, cet article s’inscrit dans une approche de sociologie politique attentive à la diversité des pratiques et « usages de l’Europe », en explorant les dynamiques verticales et horizontales de l’européanisation. France has repeatedly failed to reach its European objectives in terms of renewable electricity consumption. As for the rapid growth of biofuels, it results mainly from the weight and influence of the domestic agriculture sector. Yet, this does not mean that the European integration process has had no influence on French renewable energy policies, although not necessarily in a top-down fashion. In order to account for the interactions between French and European policies, this paper develops an approach centered on the practices and usages of Europe, and explores vertical and horizontal dynamics of Europeanization.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
La France a échoué de façon répétée à atteindre ses objectifs européens en matière de consommation d’électricité d’origine renouvelable. Quant au rapide développement des agrocarburants, il tient d’abord au poids et à l’influence du secteur agricole domestique. Cela ne signifie pas pour autant que la construction européenne a été sans influence sur les politiques françaises de soutien aux énergies renouvelables, mais pas nécessairement sur un mode hiérarchique. Afin de rendre compte des interactions entre politiques françaises et européennes, cet article s’inscrit dans une approche de sociologie politique attentive à la diversité des pratiques et « usages de l’Europe », en explorant les dynamiques verticales et horizontales de l’européanisation. France has repeatedly failed to reach its European objectives in terms of renewable electricity consumption. As for the rapid growth of biofuels, it results mainly from the weight and influence of the domestic agriculture sector. Yet, this does not mean that the European integration process has had no influence on French renewable energy policies, although not necessarily in a top-down fashion. In order to account for the interactions between French and European policies, this paper develops an approach centered on the practices and usages of Europe, and explores vertical and horizontal dynamics of Europeanization.
2014
Bocquillon, Pierre; Dobbels, Mathias
An elephant on the 13th floor of the Berlaymont? European Council and Commission relations in legislative agenda setting Journal Article
In: Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 20–38, 2014, ISSN: 1350-1763.
@article{8c1a708c23f049bf987db25c07f78977,
title = {An elephant on the 13th floor of the Berlaymont? European Council and Commission relations in legislative agenda setting},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon and Mathias Dobbels},
doi = {10.1080/13501763.2013.834548},
issn = {1350-1763},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
journal = {Journal of European Public Policy},
volume = {21},
number = {1},
pages = {20–38},
publisher = {Routledge},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bocquillon, Pierre
Review of ‘The European Council and European governance: the commanding heights of the EU’, ed. by François Foret and Yann-Svenn Rittelmeyer’ Journal Article
In: West European Politics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 255–257, 2014, ISSN: 0140-2382.
@article{8fe72502d53a459798f0fdaa053a9f9e,
title = {Review of 'The European Council and European governance: the commanding heights of the EU’, ed. by François Foret and Yann-Svenn Rittelmeyer’},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon},
doi = {10.1080/01402382.2014.962824},
issn = {0140-2382},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
journal = {West European Politics},
volume = {38},
number = {1},
pages = {255–257},
publisher = {Routledge},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2013
Bocquillon, Pierre
Review of ‘EU climate policy: industry, policy interaction and external environment’, by Elin Lerum Boasson and Jørgen Wettestad Journal Article
In: International Affairs, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1341–1342, 2013, ISSN: 0020-5850.
@article{6c2610c4bd6b45e2b0630a31fd0dfc8e,
title = {Review of 'EU climate policy: industry, policy interaction and external environment', by Elin Lerum Boasson and Jørgen Wettestad},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon},
doi = {10.1111/1468-2346.12074},
issn = {0020-5850},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-09-01},
journal = {International Affairs},
volume = {89},
number = {5},
pages = {1341–1342},
publisher = {Wiley},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bocquillon, Pierre
Review of ‘European energy policy: an environmental approach’, ed. by Francesc Morata and Israel Solorio Sandoval Journal Article
In: Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 253–255, 2013, ISSN: 0955-7571.
@article{665f1032fe2c44eba1f0c834012c8070,
title = {Review of 'European energy policy: an environmental approach', ed. by Francesc Morata and Israel Solorio Sandoval},
author = {Pierre Bocquillon},
doi = {10.1080/09557571.2013.770282},
issn = {0955-7571},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Cambridge Review of International Affairs},
volume = {26},
number = {1},
pages = {253–255},
publisher = {Routledge},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
